A connected platform for founders and investors.
A two-sided marketplace connecting startups and venture capitalists.
Systematic Ventures required a complete UI/UX design, from concept to final handoff, with distinct experiences for founders and investors.
The work brings applications, documents, financial information, deal discovery, and portfolio management into a consistent, scalable interface.
Evaluating an investment brings together company background, funding, financial information, comparative scores, and news. When those details are difficult to navigate or compare, the interface creates extra work for the investor.
Founders need to track applications, share documents, and connect with investors. Investors need to discover, compare, and manage opportunities. The design also needed to establish visual trust and accommodate future features.
The design challenge: create distinct founder and investor journeys while making complex financial information clear, trustworthy, and scalable.
The design separates founder and investor workflows while connecting them through a shared visual language, structured information, and reusable components. The featured screens show company discovery, investment insights, and transaction management; the wider design scope also includes founder and administrative workflows.
Problem: A large set of companies and investment information needs a clear entry point.
Design response: Global search, overview tabs, company tables, and watchlist controls organize discovery and provide routes into company detail.
Problem: Background, funding, and business information can be difficult to review as disconnected details.
Design response: A tabbed company profile groups the introduction, mission, industry, competitors, funding, documents, and financial information.
Problem: Prediction scores alone provide a limited view of a company.
Design response: The insights screen places AI scores beside historical comparisons and relevant news, supporting a broader review of the information.
Problem: Reviewing multiple companies means keeping track of many different indicators.
Design response: Aligned table columns, labeled metrics, trend indicators, sorting controls, and pagination structure the comparison experience.
Problem: Administrators need to move between application status, investor lists, and individual records.
Design response: An overview dashboard, investor-management table, and editable profile screens connect those administrative tasks.
Problem: A broad portal needs consistent navigation and visual hierarchy across its different workflows.
Design response: Persistent navigation, repeated layouts, and supporting component and style-guide pages establish a shared interface language.
Company background, market context, and funding information organized within a tabbed profile.
Prediction scores, historical comparisons, and related news presented together.
Company information and values shown are interface examples.
Status tabs, company search, transaction and date filters, and export controls organize the review experience. Summary cards lead into monthly totals and detailed records for incoming and outgoing activity.
Financial values shown are interface examples.
User interviews, personas, journey maps, competitive review, and information architecture.
Wireframes, core user flows, navigation, and stakeholder review.
High-fidelity screens, responsive layouts, and a reusable component library.
Interactive prototypes, usability testing, development documentation, and final design handoff.
An application-status dashboard, document upload center, investor matching results, and messaging.
A deal-flow dashboard, search and filtering, startup comparison views, and portfolio management.